CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.604 > 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.655 ± 0.141 > 0.576 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.716 < 0.724
Total TP 222 > 205
Total TN 46091 < 46118
Total FP 94 > 84
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 7
Total FP INCONS 82 > 71
Total FP COMP 6 = 6
Total FN 210 < 227
P-value 6.12267791166e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 222
Total TN 46091
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 82
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 210
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.655 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2903 7 2 5 0 7
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.49 0.69 24 6986 11 0 11 0 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 205
Total TN 46118
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 227
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.576 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5139 12 1 11 0 42
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.