CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.579 > 0.479
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.149 > 0.484 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.492 > 0.287
Positive Predictive Value 0.687 < 0.806
Total TP 257 > 150
Total TN 67864 < 68052
Total FP 139 > 39
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 2
Total FP INCONS 100 > 34
Total FP COMP 22 > 3
Total FN 265 < 372
P-value 2.69132796717e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 257
Total TN 67864
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 265
Total Scores
MCC 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.687
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.20 0.14 0.31 5 5135 11 2 9 0 31

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 150
Total TN 68052
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 372
Total Scores
MCC 0.479
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.287
Positive Predictive Value 0.806
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 2125 2 0 2 0 7
2L1F_A 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 2060 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 2 0 0 2 16
2XXA_G 0.38 0.14 1.00 6 5145 0 0 0 0 36
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.