CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		RDfolder
MCC	0.696	>	0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.702 ± 0.073	>	0.616 ± 0.092
Sensitivity	0.605	>	0.487
Positive Predictive Value	0.809	>	0.706
Total TP	601	>	484
Total TN	78313	<	78370
Total FP	166	<	215
Total FP CONTRA	24	=	24
Total FP INCONS	118	<	178
Total FP COMP	24	>	13
Total FN	392	<	509
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	601
Total TN	78313
Total FP	166
Total FP CONTRA	24
Total FP INCONS	118
Total FP COMP	24
Total FN	392

Total Scores
MCC	0.696
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.702 ± 0.073
Sensitivity	0.605
Positive Predictive Value	0.809
Nr of predictions	52

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	845	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	10	1475	0	0	0	0	9
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.84	1.00	21	2124	0	0	0	0	4
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	2060	0	0	0	0	4
2L2K_A	-	0.82	0.68	1.00	13	848	0	0	0	0	6
2L3C_B	-	0.76	0.59	1.00	10	551	0	0	0	0	7
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	27	2458	0	0	0	0	7
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.40	0.36	8	4538	23	7	7	9	12
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.78	0.84	21	2825	4	4	0	0	6
2Y9C_V	-	0.59	0.54	0.65	13	2258	8	1	6	1	11
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
3ADB_C	-	0.78	0.71	0.87	27	4155	4	0	4	0	11
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.76	16	2680	6	0	5	1	12
3AM1_B	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	22	3216	2	0	2	0	13
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2982	7	0	5	2	11
3J0L_a	-	0.22	0.19	0.27	3	1117	8	1	7	0	13
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3NKB_B	-	0.40	0.31	0.53	8	2001	7	0	7	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.20	0.17	0.25	1	557	6	1	2	3	5
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	730	0	0	0	0	1
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.78	21	3889	6	0	6	0	21
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.38	0.52	15	4724	15	0	14	1	25
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ATO_G	-	0.73	0.70	0.78	7	519	2	1	1	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	484
Total TN	78370
Total FP	215
Total FP CONTRA	24
Total FP INCONS	178
Total FP COMP	13
Total FN	509

Total Scores
MCC	0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.616 ± 0.092
Sensitivity	0.487
Positive Predictive Value	0.706
Nr of predictions	52

^top

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	14	847	0	0	0	0	4
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.78	0.74	0.82	14	1468	3	1	2	0	5
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.96	1.00	24	2121	0	0	0	0	1
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2067	13	2	11	0	24
2L2K_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	17	844	0	0	0	0	2
2L3C_B	-	0.91	0.82	1.00	14	547	0	0	0	0	3
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.88	1.00	30	2455	0	0	0	0	4
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1526	14	2	12	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	0	0	0	0	2
2LDT_A	-	0.68	0.47	1.00	7	458	0	0	0	0	8
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	4538	22	5	17	0	20
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	21	2829	0	0	0	0	6
2Y9C_V	-	0.57	0.50	0.67	12	2260	7	1	5	1	12
2YIE_X	-	0.38	0.33	0.44	4	1369	5	1	4	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	0.43	0.42	0.45	5	1529	6	3	3	0	7
3ADB_C	-	0.46	0.39	0.54	15	4158	13	0	13	0	23
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.43	0.55	12	2679	11	1	9	1	16
3AM1_B	-	0.47	0.43	0.54	15	3212	13	1	12	0	20
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.15	0.22	4	2985	16	2	12	2	23
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1124	4	1	3	0	16
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	462	3	1	2	0	4
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1220	5	0	5	0	17
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.17	0.31	5	2759	11	0	11	0	25
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.57	0.94	17	2832	2	0	1	1	13
3NKB_B	-	0.37	0.31	0.47	8	1999	9	0	9	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.41	0.17	1.00	1	560	3	0	0	3	5
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	731	0	0	0	0	2
3R4F_A	-	0.76	0.68	0.85	17	2125	3	1	2	0	8
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.17	0.54	7	3903	6	0	6	0	35
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	0	0	0	0	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.27	0.23	0.33	9	4726	18	1	17	0	31
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ATO_G	-	0.63	0.40	1.00	4	524	0	0	0	0	6
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.32	0.60	6	1265	4	0	4	0	13
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.32	0.60	6	1316	4	0	4	0	13
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]