CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.659 > 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.193 > 0.587 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.579 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.755 < 0.839
Total TP 139 > 104
Total TN 29854 < 29914
Total FP 55 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 2
Total FP INCONS 40 > 18
Total FP COMP 10 > 5
Total FN 101 < 136
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 139
Total TN 29854
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.755
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 29914
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.839
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.