CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.620 > 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.225 > 0.606 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.504 > 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.770 < 0.779
Total TP 117 > 113
Total TN 20628 < 20635
Total FP 36 > 33
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 6
Total FP INCONS 31 > 26
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 115 < 119
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 20628
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 115
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.225
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.770
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRN_A 0.20 0.14 0.31 5 5135 11 2 9 0 31

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 20635
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.779
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.