CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Afold
MCC 0.560 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.079 > 0.696 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.612 > 0.594
Total TP 1193 > 1167
Total TN 1384890 > 1384875
Total FP 821 < 870
Total FP CONTRA 97 < 106
Total FP INCONS 660 < 692
Total FP COMP 64 < 72
Total FN 1130 < 1156
P-value 3.85233844192e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Fold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1193
Total TN 1384890
Total FP 821
Total FP CONTRA 97
Total FP INCONS 660
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 1130
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.612
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 11 692 0 0 0 0 5
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 344 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_B 0.90 0.88 0.92 22 2121 2 0 2 0 3
2L1F_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 2057 2 0 2 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.79 0.91 31 6071 5 0 3 2 8
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 484 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.93 0.86 1.00 36 5115 0 0 0 0 6
2YIE_X - 0.25 0.25 0.27 3 1367 8 2 6 0 9
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.65 1.00 28 6077 2 0 0 2 15
3J2C_O - 0.59 0.54 0.65 34 10244 18 1 17 0 29
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.19 7 9008 30 5 25 0 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21890 57 2 53 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
3ZEX_B - 0.27 0.24 0.30 135 1071923 334 34 288 12 423
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1167
Total TN 1384875
Total FP 870
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 692
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 1156
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.696 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 12 691 0 0 0 0 4
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 343 0 0 0 0 2
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 4
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.73 0.60 0.90 26 6076 5 0 3 2 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 1 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3OVS_D - 0.80 0.77 0.83 10 549 2 0 2 0 3
3P22_G - 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 730 1 0 1 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 1 0 0 1 1
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 1 0 0 1 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.