CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.589 > 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.590 ± 0.103 > 0.446 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.525 > 0.303
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 < 0.782
Total TP 522 > 301
Total TN 203485 < 203886
Total FP 330 > 98
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 7
Total FP INCONS 232 > 77
Total FP COMP 66 > 14
Total FN 473 < 694
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 522
Total TN 203485
Total FP 330
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 232
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 473
Total Scores
MCC 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.590 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.93 0.86 1.00 36 5115 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 301
Total TN 203886
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 77
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 694
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.446 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.303
Positive Predictive Value 0.782
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.87 0.80 0.94 16 973 1 0 1 0 4
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 3 0 0 3 16
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 7 5144 0 0 0 0 35
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70876 0 0 0 0 132
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3NPB_A 0.30 0.24 0.39 11 6993 18 1 16 1 35
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.