CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.599 > 0.509
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.136 > 0.522 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.543 > 0.310
Positive Predictive Value 0.665 < 0.842
Total TP 401 > 229
Total TN 105145 < 105476
Total FP 259 > 46
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 3
Total FP INCONS 177 > 40
Total FP COMP 57 > 3
Total FN 337 < 509
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 401
Total TN 105145
Total FP 259
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 177
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 337
Total Scores
MCC 0.599
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.665
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 2057 2 0 2 0 3
2L1F_B 0.90 0.88 0.92 22 2121 2 0 2 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XXA_G 0.93 0.86 1.00 36 5115 0 0 0 0 6
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 229
Total TN 105476
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 509
Total Scores
MCC 0.509
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.522 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.310
Positive Predictive Value 0.842
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUU_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_A 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 2060 2 0 2 0 6
2L1F_B 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 2125 2 0 2 0 7
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 2 0 0 2 16
2XXA_G 0.38 0.14 1.00 6 5145 0 0 0 0 36
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.