CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RDfolder
MCC 0.726 > 0.614
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.077 > 0.648 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.658 > 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.808 > 0.740
Total TP 769 > 604
Total TN 87935 < 88071
Total FP 216 < 228
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 24
Total FP INCONS 162 < 188
Total FP COMP 33 > 16
Total FN 400 < 565
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 769
Total TN 87935
Total FP 216
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 162
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 400
Total Scores
MCC 0.726
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.808
Nr of predictions 63

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 11 692 0 0 0 0 5
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 344 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 2057 2 0 2 0 3
2L1F_B 0.90 0.88 0.92 22 2121 2 0 2 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_X - 0.25 0.25 0.27 3 1367 8 2 6 0 9
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.20 0.19 0.23 3 1115 10 2 8 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 604
Total TN 88071
Total FP 228
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 188
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 565
Total Scores
MCC 0.614
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 63

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 696 7 0 7 0 16
2KUR_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KUU_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 6
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2067 13 2 11 0 24
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4538 22 5 17 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 2260 7 1 5 1 12
2YIE_X - 0.38 0.33 0.44 4 1369 5 1 4 0 8
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.46 0.39 0.54 15 4158 13 0 13 0 23
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 184 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 731 0 0 0 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.76 0.68 0.85 17 2125 3 1 2 0 8
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 248 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.