CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.601 > 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.116 > 0.080 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.495 > 0.241
Positive Predictive Value 0.730 < 0.882
Total TP 523 > 255
Total TN 1177195 < 1177622
Total FP 208 > 36
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 3
Total FP INCONS 175 > 31
Total FP COMP 15 > 2
Total FN 533 < 801
P-value 3.29976619895e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 523
Total TN 1177195
Total FP 208
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 175
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 533
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.730
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
3J20_2 0.61 0.52 0.72 329 1116306 135 8 122 5 304
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 255
Total TN 1177622
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 801
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.080 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.241
Positive Predictive Value 0.882
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
3J20_2 0.59 0.40 0.88 251 1116480 36 3 31 2 382
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.