CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.635 > 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.079 > 0.664 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.531 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.761 < 0.781
Total TP 769 > 633
Total TN 266061 < 266260
Total FP 276 > 205
Total FP CONTRA 30 > 16
Total FP INCONS 211 > 162
Total FP COMP 35 > 27
Total FN 678 < 814
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 769
Total TN 266061
Total FP 276
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 211
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 678
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.761
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2YIE_X - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 1369 3 1 1 1 5
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.78 0.60 1.00 26 6079 2 0 0 2 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_M - 0.54 0.42 0.69 86 106367 43 6 32 5 121
3J2C_O - 0.82 0.67 1.00 42 10254 1 0 0 1 21
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_G - 0.70 0.61 0.82 45 16416 14 1 9 4 29
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 633
Total TN 266260
Total FP 205
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 162
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 814
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_M - 0.37 0.16 0.83 34 106450 8 0 7 1 173
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10296 0 0 0 0 63
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.61 0.92 45 16422 7 0 4 3 29
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21914 33 1 30 2 77
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.