CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	IPknot		Cylofold
MCC	0.642	>	0.533
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.677 ± 0.085	>	0.607 ± 0.087
Sensitivity	0.540	>	0.447
Positive Predictive Value	0.771	>	0.644
Total TP	571	>	473
Total TN	123759	<	123765
Total FP	189	<	277
Total FP CONTRA	17	<	22
Total FP INCONS	153	<	240
Total FP COMP	19	>	15
Total FN	487	<	585
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of IPknot and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of IPknot and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	571
Total TN	123759
Total FP	189
Total FP CONTRA	17
Total FP INCONS	153
Total FP COMP	19
Total FN	487

Total Scores
MCC	0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.677 ± 0.085
Sensitivity	0.540
Positive Predictive Value	0.771
Nr of predictions	42

^top

2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.30	0.55	6	1529	5	1	4	0	14
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	0	0	0	0	2
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.84	0.77	0.91	30	6072	4	0	3	1	9
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2YIE_Z	-	0.43	0.42	0.45	5	1529	6	3	3	0	7
2YIE_X	-	0.67	0.58	0.78	7	1369	3	1	1	1	5
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.84	16	2984	5	0	3	2	11
3J0L_h	-	0.78	0.60	1.00	26	6079	2	0	0	2	17
3J0L_a	-	0.21	0.19	0.25	3	1116	9	1	8	0	13
3J0L_1	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	12	1212	2	0	1	1	7
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1218	7	0	7	0	17
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.39	0.36	0.43	12	6188	18	2	14	2	21
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.40	0.52	12	2827	12	0	11	1	18
3J2C_O	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	42	10254	1	0	0	1	21
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.55	0.81	29	7839	9	0	7	2	24
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.48	0.80	20	3891	5	0	5	0	22
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.68	0.54	0.87	20	3137	3	1	2	0	17
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.75	0.97	30	4722	2	0	1	1	10
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.63	0.82	31	6983	7	0	7	0	18
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21894	53	4	47	2	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.33	0.54	14	4345	13	1	11	1	28
4ATO_G	-	0.41	0.40	0.44	4	519	6	0	5	1	6
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.42	0.67	8	1314	4	0	4	0	11
4FNJ_A	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	10	585	0	0	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.56	0.86	18	3465	3	1	2	0	14
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.56	0.87	20	5128	3	1	2	0	16
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	473
Total TN	123765
Total FP	277
Total FP CONTRA	22
Total FP INCONS	240
Total FP COMP	15
Total FN	585

Total Scores
MCC	0.533
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.607 ± 0.087
Sensitivity	0.447
Positive Predictive Value	0.644
Nr of predictions	42

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.50	0.44	0.59	17	6076	12	2	10	0	22
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2982	7	0	5	2	11
3J0L_h	-	0.48	0.37	0.62	16	6079	10	0	10	0	27
3J0L_a	-	0.22	0.19	0.27	3	1117	8	1	7	0	13
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.39	0.36	0.43	12	6188	18	2	14	2	21
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.70	0.70	16	2903	7	2	5	0	7
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3J2C_O	-	0.43	0.33	0.55	21	10258	18	0	17	1	42
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.43	0.72	23	7843	11	0	9	2	30
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.78	21	3889	6	0	6	0	21
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.38	0.54	14	3544	12	1	11	0	23
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.38	0.52	15	4724	15	0	14	1	25
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.49	0.69	24	6986	11	0	11	0	25
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21897	51	2	46	3	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ATO_G	-	0.73	0.70	0.78	7	519	2	1	1	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4
4FNJ_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	8	587	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.14	0.31	5	5135	11	2	9	0	31
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]