CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot RDfolder
MCC 0.661 > 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.112 > 0.573 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.559 > 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.791 > 0.648
Total TP 283 > 199
Total TN 39008 < 39059
Total FP 85 < 113
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 12
Total FP INCONS 67 < 96
Total FP COMP 10 > 5
Total FN 223 < 307
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 283
Total TN 39008
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.791
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 1369 3 1 1 1 5
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.41 0.40 0.44 4 519 6 0 5 1 6
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 39059
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 307
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.648
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.38 0.33 0.44 4 1369 5 1 4 0 8
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_8 - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 184 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 248 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.