CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot UNAFold
MCC 0.554 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.077 > 0.603 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.448 > 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.688 > 0.547
Total TP 1245 > 1172
Total TN 2481894 > 2481563
Total FP 611 < 1039
Total FP CONTRA 51 < 98
Total FP INCONS 514 < 871
Total FP COMP 46 < 70
Total FN 1537 < 1610
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1245
Total TN 2481894
Total FP 611
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 514
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 1537
Total Scores
MCC 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 1369 3 1 1 1 5
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.78 0.60 1.00 26 6079 2 0 0 2 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_2 0.61 0.52 0.72 329 1116306 135 8 122 5 304
3J2C_M - 0.54 0.42 0.69 86 106367 43 6 32 5 121
3J2C_O - 0.82 0.67 1.00 42 10254 1 0 0 1 21
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.70 0.61 0.82 45 16416 14 1 9 4 29
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_B - 0.27 0.18 0.40 101 1072127 154 6 146 2 457
3ZEX_H - 0.20 0.18 0.22 7 9013 25 4 21 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.41 0.40 0.44 4 519 6 0 5 1 6
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1172
Total TN 2481563
Total FP 1039
Total FP CONTRA 98
Total FP INCONS 871
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 1610
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 10 455 0 0 0 0 5
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 2 0 2 0 8
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.60 0.93 26 6077 4 0 2 2 17
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_2 0.47 0.41 0.53 260 1116278 230 15 212 3 373
3J2C_M - 0.56 0.46 0.69 96 106351 49 7 37 5 111
3J2C_O - 0.52 0.44 0.61 28 10250 19 0 18 1 35
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.64 0.89 47 16418 12 0 6 6 27
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_B - 0.31 0.28 0.35 154 1071936 301 33 257 11 404
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.