CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.455 > 0.410
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.094 > 0.502 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.466 > 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.452 > 0.442
Total TP 659 > 548
Total TN 185896 < 186113
Total FP 933 > 767
Total FP CONTRA 98 > 89
Total FP INCONS 700 > 603
Total FP COMP 135 > 75
Total FN 754 < 865
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 659
Total TN 185896
Total FP 933
Total FP CONTRA 98
Total FP INCONS 700
Total FP COMP 135
Total FN 754
Total Scores
MCC 0.455
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 5 0 0 5 0
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2M58_A - 0.20 0.24 0.18 4 1631 19 2 16 1 13
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 182 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16456 15 1 14 0 74
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZEX_H - 0.14 0.18 0.12 7 8987 52 14 37 1 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2610 29 4 14 11 12
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 8 0 6 2 7
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FNJ_A - 0.83 0.81 0.87 13 580 3 0 2 1 3
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21
4FRN_A 0.12 0.14 0.12 5 5110 38 1 35 2 31
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 4 0 0 4 0
4JF2_A 0.66 0.68 0.66 21 2818 11 0 11 0 10
4JRC_A - 0.20 0.22 0.21 5 1516 19 0 19 0 18

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 548
Total TN 186113
Total FP 767
Total FP CONTRA 89
Total FP INCONS 603
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 865
Total Scores
MCC 0.410
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.442
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LDT_A - 0.86 0.80 0.92 12 452 1 0 1 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 1161 3 0 0 3 1
2LWK_A - 0.37 0.38 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 8
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1364 15 4 10 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 9 1 5 3 7
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 270 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 2 0 0 2 0
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.