CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.596 > 0.061
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.128 > 0.019 ± 0.031
Sensitivity 0.483 > 0.010
Positive Predictive Value 0.741 > 0.385
Total TP 246 > 5
Total TN 73045 < 73364
Total FP 109 > 45
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 0
Total FP INCONS 73 > 8
Total FP COMP 23 < 37
Total FN 263 < 504
P-value 2.57237423209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 246
Total TN 73045
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 263
Total Scores
MCC 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.741
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_0 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 10
3J2L_3 0.54 0.42 0.71 22 7844 11 1 8 2 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.21 0.46 11 14172 13 2 11 0 41
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.63 0.74 31 6979 11 2 9 0 18
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.44 0.70 14 3466 6 2 4 0 18

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 5
Total TN 73364
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 504
Total Scores
MCC 0.061
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.019 ± 0.031
Sensitivity 0.010
Positive Predictive Value 0.385
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.