CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.623 > 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.081 > 0.590 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.514 < 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.759 > 0.653
Total TP 511 < 513
Total TN 203598 > 203485
Total FP 211 < 334
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 36
Total FP INCONS 134 < 237
Total FP COMP 49 < 61
Total FN 484 > 482
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 511
Total TN 203598
Total FP 211
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 484
Total Scores
MCC 0.623
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.73 0.70 0.78 14 972 4 0 4 0 6
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 3 0 0 3 16
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.80 0.71 0.91 30 5118 4 0 3 1 12
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.41 0.64 54 70791 32 7 24 1 78
3IZF_C 0.67 0.59 0.76 32 6861 11 1 9 1 22
3J20_0 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.54 0.42 0.71 22 7844 11 1 8 2 31
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 1 5 3 19
3O58_3 0.52 0.40 0.67 14 12382 17 2 5 10 21
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 13 4 6 3 10
3PDR_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 41 12834 9 0 5 4 31
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 2 6 0 19
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.21 0.46 11 14172 13 2 11 0 41
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.63 0.74 31 6979 11 2 9 0 18
4A1C_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 11 2 8 1 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 36 2 17 17 28
4AOB_A 0.62 0.55 0.72 23 4339 10 0 9 1 19
4ENB_A 0.26 0.11 0.67 2 1272 1 0 1 0 17
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.44 0.70 14 3466 6 2 4 0 18

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 513
Total TN 203485
Total FP 334
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 237
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 482
Total Scores
MCC 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.590 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
2XXA_G 0.26 0.24 0.29 10 5116 25 1 24 0 32
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.