CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Afold
MCC 0.669 > 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.082 > 0.642 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.562 > 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.800 > 0.620
Total TP 654 > 622
Total TN 254584 > 254397
Total FP 229 < 449
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 65
Total FP INCONS 131 < 317
Total FP COMP 66 < 67
Total FN 510 < 542
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 654
Total TN 254584
Total FP 229
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 510
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.800
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.84 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 3
2KUR_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.85 0.77 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 5
2KUW_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 2 0 2 0 7
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 859 2 0 2 0 18
2L1F_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 2058 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XXA_G 0.67 0.57 0.80 24 5121 7 0 6 1 18
2ZZM_B 0.56 0.44 0.74 14 3467 5 4 1 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 3629 3 0 2 1 13
3AKZ_H 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2680 0 0 0 0 7
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3IYQ_A 0.45 0.38 0.54 36 60659 37 4 27 6 58
3IZ4_A 0.69 0.55 0.88 72 70794 11 3 7 1 60
3IZF_C 0.67 0.57 0.79 31 6864 9 1 7 1 23
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.38 0.30 0.48 10 12225 21 3 8 10 23
3JYX_3 0.58 0.56 0.60 15 6303 21 1 9 11 12
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 2 4 3 19
3O58_2 0.79 0.79 0.79 30 7222 10 4 4 2 8
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 622
Total TN 254397
Total FP 449
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 317
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 542
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.620
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.