CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.610 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.208 > 0.538 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.490 > 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.765 > 0.616
Total TP 140 > 135
Total TN 36944 > 36908
Total FP 59 < 96
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 12
Total FP INCONS 39 < 72
Total FP COMP 16 > 12
Total FN 146 < 151
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 36944
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 146
Total Scores
MCC 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.765
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 36908
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.