CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.645 > 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.104 < 0.633 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.530 < 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.792 > 0.740
Total TP 339 < 342
Total TN 77532 > 77498
Total FP 107 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 14
Total FP INCONS 78 < 106
Total FP COMP 18 > 13
Total FN 301 > 298
P-value 1.00960443857e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 77532
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 301
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.792
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 77498
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 298
Total Scores
MCC 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.