CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Fold
MCC 0.661 > 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.070 > 0.641 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.556 > 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.787 > 0.625
Total TP 1163 > 1062
Total TN 1413299 > 1413078
Total FP 392 < 713
Total FP CONTRA 45 < 72
Total FP INCONS 269 < 564
Total FP COMP 78 > 77
Total FN 930 < 1031
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1163
Total TN 1413299
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 269
Total FP COMP 78
Total FN 930
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 40

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.85 0.77 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 5
2KUW_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 2 0 2 0 7
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 859 2 0 2 0 18
2L1F_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 2058 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.46 0.68 13 2907 7 0 6 1 15
2XKV_B 0.59 0.55 0.65 11 4543 18 0 6 12 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2XXA_G 0.67 0.57 0.80 24 5121 7 0 6 1 18
3AKZ_H 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2680 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3IYQ_A 0.45 0.38 0.54 36 60659 37 4 27 6 58
3IZ4_A 0.69 0.55 0.88 72 70794 11 3 7 1 60
3IZF_C 0.67 0.57 0.79 31 6864 9 1 7 1 23
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.67 0.58 0.77 366 1116289 118 14 96 8 267
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 2 4 3 19
3O58_2 0.79 0.79 0.79 30 7222 10 4 4 2 8
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3PDR_A 0.73 0.63 0.87 45 12828 9 2 5 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1062
Total TN 1413078
Total FP 713
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 564
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 1031
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 40

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 2057 2 0 2 0 3
2L1F_B 0.90 0.88 0.92 22 2121 2 0 2 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.93 0.86 1.00 36 5115 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_2 0.45 0.40 0.51 256 1116260 253 15 234 4 377
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.