CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.663 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.060 > 0.628 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.557 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.789 > 0.649
Total TP 1311 > 1191
Total TN 1450645 > 1450471
Total FP 454 < 748
Total FP CONTRA 55 < 68
Total FP INCONS 295 < 576
Total FP COMP 104 = 104
Total FN 1043 < 1163
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1311
Total TN 1450645
Total FP 454
Total FP CONTRA 55
Total FP INCONS 295
Total FP COMP 104
Total FN 1043
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.789
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.89 0.84 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 3
2KUR_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.85 0.77 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 5
2KUW_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 2 0 2 0 7
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 859 2 0 2 0 18
2L1F_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 2058 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.46 0.68 13 2907 7 0 6 1 15
2XKV_B 0.59 0.55 0.65 11 4543 18 0 6 12 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2XXA_G 0.67 0.57 0.80 24 5121 7 0 6 1 18
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2680 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3GX2_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 24 4342 6 0 5 1 16
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3IYQ_A 0.45 0.38 0.54 36 60659 37 4 27 6 58
3IZ4_A 0.69 0.55 0.88 72 70794 11 3 7 1 60
3IZF_C 0.67 0.57 0.79 31 6864 9 1 7 1 23
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J20_2 0.67 0.58 0.77 366 1116289 118 14 96 8 267
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.58 0.56 0.60 15 6303 21 1 9 11 12
3JYX_4 0.38 0.30 0.48 10 12225 21 3 8 10 23
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.69 0.59 0.82 27 6988 9 2 4 3 19
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3O58_2 0.79 0.79 0.79 30 7222 10 4 4 2 8
3PDR_A 0.73 0.63 0.87 45 12828 9 2 5 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1191
Total TN 1450471
Total FP 748
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 576
Total FP COMP 104
Total FN 1163
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.25 0.24 0.27 10 5114 27 1 26 0 32
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60617 84 19 61 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.54 0.46 0.64 61 70781 39 3 31 5 71
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 1 6 0 21
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_2 0.49 0.44 0.56 276 1116272 221 10 207 4 357
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3JYV_7 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 2832 8 0 8 0 22
3JYX_3 0.64 0.63 0.65 17 6302 19 1 8 10 10
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 34 4 18 12 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.61 0.82 28 6987 9 0 6 3 18
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 35 2 20 13 23
3O58_2 0.75 0.76 0.74 29 7221 11 3 7 1 9
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W3S_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 31 4722 1 0 0 1 9
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.61 0.79 30 6983 8 1 7 0 19
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.27 0.64 14 14174 16 2 6 8 38
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.30 0.22 0.41 7 3469 10 1 9 0 25
4FRN_A 0.45 0.36 0.57 13 5128 10 2 8 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.