CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.646 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.126 < 0.663 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.532 > 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.789 < 0.837
Total TP 288 > 262
Total TN 79943 < 79995
Total FP 126 > 73
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 5
Total FP INCONS 67 > 46
Total FP COMP 49 > 22
Total FN 253 < 279
P-value 2.94377603181e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 288
Total TN 79943
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 253
Total Scores
MCC 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.789
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.84 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 3
2KUR_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.85 0.77 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 5
2KUW_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 2 0 2 0 7
2L1F_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 2058 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3A3A_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 3629 3 0 2 1 13
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3JYX_4 0.38 0.30 0.48 10 12225 21 3 8 10 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 79995
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 279
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.