CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.548 > 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.150 < 0.553 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.429 < 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.679
Total TP 159 < 163
Total TN 53672 > 53657
Total FP 92 > 90
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 11
Total FP INCONS 58 < 66
Total FP COMP 26 > 13
Total FN 212 > 208
P-value 0.0173590247318

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 53672
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.150
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 53657
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 208
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.