CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.521 > 0.061
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.450 ± 0.175 > 0.019 ± 0.031
Sensitivity 0.352 > 0.010
Positive Predictive Value 0.778 > 0.385
Total TP 179 > 5
Total TN 73147 < 73364
Total FP 57 > 45
Total FP CONTRA 2 > 0
Total FP INCONS 49 > 8
Total FP COMP 6 < 37
Total FN 330 < 504
P-value 1.86109605532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 73147
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 330
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.450 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.352
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 5
Total TN 73364
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 504
Total Scores
MCC 0.061
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.019 ± 0.031
Sensitivity 0.010
Positive Predictive Value 0.385
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.