CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold Cylofold
MCC 0.650 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.066 > 0.654 ± 0.061
Sensitivity 0.557 > 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.765 > 0.716
Total TP 1057 > 976
Total TN 222180 < 222197
Total FP 374 < 437
Total FP CONTRA 37 < 44
Total FP INCONS 287 < 344
Total FP COMP 50 > 49
Total FN 842 < 923
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of performance of McQFold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1057
Total TN 222180
Total FP 374
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 287
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 842
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.765
Nr of predictions 74

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.59 0.53 0.68 21 5120 13 3 7 3 19
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 843 0 0 0 0 1
2L3C_B - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 546 0 0 0 0 2
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 582 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 2 0 1 1 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.31 0.30 0.33 6 4542 25 1 11 13 14
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.27 0.24 0.32 10 5120 21 0 21 0 32
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 1 0 0 1 6
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 1 0 0 1 6
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_h - 0.65 0.49 0.88 21 6081 3 0 3 0 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.53 0.43 0.66 27 10255 15 1 13 1 36
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.70 0.93 43 9134 4 1 2 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.36 0.31 0.44 8 1998 10 1 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 40 12834 9 0 6 3 32
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 1 0 0 1 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.53 0.90 26 6992 3 1 2 0 23
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 523 5 0 5 0 10
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 588 7 0 7 0 16
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 20 5130 1 1 0 0 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 976
Total TN 222197
Total FP 437
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 344
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 923
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.061
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 74

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.72 0.60 0.86 24 5123 8 2 2 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 10 1475 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L2K_A - 0.82 0.68 1.00 13 848 0 0 0 0 6
2L3C_B - 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 7
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.71 0.87 27 4155 4 0 4 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_h - 0.48 0.37 0.62 16 6079 10 0 10 0 27
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2903 7 2 5 0 7
3J2C_O - 0.43 0.33 0.55 21 10258 18 0 17 1 42
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3NDB_M - 0.58 0.48 0.71 29 9139 13 1 11 1 32
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.20 0.17 0.25 1 557 6 1 2 3 5
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.49 0.69 24 6986 11 0 11 0 25
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21897 51 2 46 3 77
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.73 0.70 0.78 7 519 2 1 1 0 3
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 8 587 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.20 0.14 0.31 5 5135 11 2 9 0 31
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.