CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.577 > 0.020
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.146 > 0.006 ± 0.013
Sensitivity 0.488 > 0.002
Positive Predictive Value 0.688 > 0.200
Total TP 223 > 1
Total TN 58857 < 59176
Total FP 111 > 23
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 0
Total FP INCONS 92 > 4
Total FP COMP 10 < 19
Total FN 234 < 456
P-value 2.57237423209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 223
Total TN 58857
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 234
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.488
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1
Total TN 59176
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 456
Total Scores
MCC 0.020
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.006 ± 0.013
Sensitivity 0.002
Positive Predictive Value 0.200
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.