CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.608 > 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.251 > 0.432 ± 0.364
Sensitivity 0.468 > 0.300
Positive Predictive Value 0.795 < 0.864
Total TP 89 > 57
Total TN 25572 < 25618
Total FP 24 > 10
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 2
Total FP INCONS 19 > 7
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 101 < 133
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 25572
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.251
Sensitivity 0.468
Positive Predictive Value 0.795
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 25618
Total FP 10
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.432 ± 0.364
Sensitivity 0.300
Positive Predictive Value 0.864
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.