CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.590 > 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.311 < 0.566 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.470 > 0.436
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.680
Total TP 110 > 102
Total TN 22785 > 22782
Total FP 39 < 50
Total FP CONTRA 3 = 3
Total FP INCONS 34 < 45
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 124 < 132
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 22785
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.311
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 22782
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.436
Positive Predictive Value 0.680
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4FRN_A 0.20 0.14 0.31 5 5135 11 2 9 0 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.