CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.558 > 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.265 < 0.569 ± 0.233
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.725 > 0.581
Total TP 124 < 125
Total TN 36957 > 36913
Total FP 49 < 92
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 12
Total FP INCONS 41 < 78
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 162 > 161
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 36957
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 36913
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.233
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.55 0.50 0.61 20 4720 14 1 12 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14150 46 6 40 0 52
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.