CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.481 > 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.471 ± 0.283 > 0.445 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.366 < 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.641 > 0.409
Total TP 98 < 105
Total TN 38204 > 38100
Total FP 55 < 173
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 8
Total FP INCONS 44 < 144
Total FP COMP 0 < 21
Total FN 170 > 163
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 38204
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 170
Total Scores
MCC 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.471 ± 0.283
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.641
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.13 0.09 0.19 3 7487 13 5 8 0 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 105
Total TN 38100
Total FP 173
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.409
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
4FRN_A 0.12 0.14 0.12 5 5110 38 1 35 2 31
4JF2_A 0.66 0.68 0.66 21 2818 11 0 11 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.