CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Mastr(20)
MCC 0.608 > 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.251 > 0.513 ± 0.416
Sensitivity 0.468 > 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.795 < 0.802
Total TP 89 > 65
Total TN 25572 < 25603
Total FP 24 > 17
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 1
Total FP INCONS 19 > 15
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 101 < 125
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 25572
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.251
Sensitivity 0.468
Positive Predictive Value 0.795
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 65
Total TN 25603
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.416
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.87 0.80 0.94 16 973 1 0 1 0 4
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.