CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.558 > 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.265 > 0.512 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.725 > 0.595
Total TP 124 > 122
Total TN 36957 > 36923
Total FP 49 < 99
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 9
Total FP INCONS 41 < 74
Total FP COMP 2 < 16
Total FN 162 < 164
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 36957
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 36923
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.