Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Mastr(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(20) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
Metric |
PETfold_2.0(20) |
|
Mastr(20) |
MCC |
0.647 |
>
|
0.189 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
>
|
0.189
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.509 |
>
|
0.123 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
>
|
0.304 |
Total TP |
29 |
>
|
7 |
Total TN |
6986 |
<
|
6998 |
Total FP |
6 |
<
|
16 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
>
|
0 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
<
|
16 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
=
|
0 |
Total FN |
28 |
<
|
50 |
P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and Mastr(20)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(20) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and Mastr(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and Mastr(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(20) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_2.0(20)
and Mastr(20)).
Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
29 |
Total TN |
6986 |
Total FP |
6 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
Total FN |
28 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.647 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.509 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of Mastr(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
7 |
Total TN |
6998 |
Total FP |
16 |
Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
Total FP INCONS |
16 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
Total FN |
50 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.189 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.189
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.123 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.304 |
Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|