CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_2.0(seed) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_2.0(seed) Mastr(20)
MCC 0.761 > 0.189
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.761 ± > 0.189 ±
Sensitivity 0.614 > 0.123
Positive Predictive Value 0.946 > 0.304
Total TP 35 > 7
Total TN 6984 < 6998
Total FP 3 < 16
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 2 < 16
Total FP COMP 1 > 0
Total FN 22 < 50
P-value 0.0

^top



Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) and Mastr(20)).

^top




Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 35
Total TN 6984
Total FP 3
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 22
Total Scores
MCC 0.761
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.761 ±
Sensitivity 0.614
Positive Predictive Value 0.946
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22

^top


Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 6998
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 50
Total Scores
MCC 0.189
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.189 ±
Sensitivity 0.123
Positive Predictive Value 0.304
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.19 0.12 0.30 7 6998 16 0 16 0 50

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Copyright© - Adam Mickiewicz University & IIMCB - All rights reserved