CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.678 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.111 > 0.564 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.559 > 0.482
Positive Predictive Value 0.826 > 0.668
Total TP 355 > 306
Total TN 96569 > 96541
Total FP 102 < 178
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 18
Total FP INCONS 71 < 134
Total FP COMP 27 > 26
Total FN 280 < 329
P-value 2.22210847902e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 355
Total TN 96569
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 280
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.826
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 96541
Total FP 178
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 329
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.482
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.