CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	PETfold_pre2.0(20)		Cylofold
MCC	0.746	>	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.722 ± 0.116	>	0.643 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.624	>	0.521
Positive Predictive Value	0.896	>	0.722
Total TP	181	>	151
Total TN	33931	>	33924
Total FP	26	<	64
Total FP CONTRA	1	<	7
Total FP INCONS	20	<	51
Total FP COMP	5	<	6
Total FN	109	<	139
P-value	0.0

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	181
Total TN	33931
Total FP	26
Total FP CONTRA	1
Total FP INCONS	20
Total FP COMP	5
Total FN	109

Total Scores
MCC	0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.722 ± 0.116
Sensitivity	0.624
Positive Predictive Value	0.896
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.70	1.00	21	2829	0	0	0	0	9
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.62	0.97	33	7841	3	0	1	2	20
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.71	0.92	35	6983	3	0	3	0	14
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.43	0.53	10	2984	11	0	9	2	13
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.60	0.93	25	4344	3	0	2	1	17
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.42	0.89	8	1266	1	0	1	0	11
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.42	0.73	8	1315	3	0	3	0	11
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.63	0.91	20	3464	2	1	1	0	12

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	151
Total TN	33924
Total FP	64
Total FP CONTRA	7
Total FP INCONS	51
Total FP COMP	6
Total FN	139

Total Scores
MCC	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.643 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.521
Positive Predictive Value	0.722
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.70	0.70	16	2903	7	2	5	0	7
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.43	0.72	23	7843	11	0	9	2	30
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.49	0.69	24	6986	11	0	11	0	25
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.39	0.41	9	2981	15	2	11	2	14
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]