Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & PETfold_2.0(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
PETfold_2.0(20) |
MCC |
0.647 |
=
|
0.647 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
=
|
0.647
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.509 |
=
|
0.509 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
=
|
0.829 |
Total TP |
29 |
=
|
29 |
Total TN |
6986 |
=
|
6986 |
Total FP |
6 |
=
|
6 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
=
|
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
=
|
5 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
=
|
0 |
Total FN |
28 |
=
|
28 |
P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PETfold_2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PETfold_2.0(20)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PETfold_2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PETfold_2.0(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PETfold_2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PETfold_2.0(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PETfold_2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PETfold_2.0(20)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
29 |
Total TN |
6986 |
Total FP |
6 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
Total FN |
28 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.647 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.509 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of PETfold_2.0(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(20)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
29 |
Total TN |
6986 |
Total FP |
6 |
Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
Total FN |
28 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.647 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.647
±
|
Sensitivity |
0.509 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.829 |
Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|