CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.649 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114 > 0.569 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.530 > 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.798 > 0.738
Total TP 364 > 295
Total TN 110739 < 110795
Total FP 120 < 139
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 7
Total FP INCONS 88 < 98
Total FP COMP 28 < 34
Total FN 323 < 392
P-value 2.20167918023e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 364
Total TN 110739
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 323
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.798
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 295
Total TN 110795
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 392
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.738
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 12 1 9 2 36
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.18 3 7486 21 2 12 7 30
3J3E_7 0.62 0.48 0.81 26 7108 6 0 6 0 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 17 1 13 3 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 5 0 5 0 24
3J3V_B 0.63 0.42 0.96 24 6996 1 0 1 0 33
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.49 0.96 24 6996 1 0 1 0 25
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.19 0.38 10 14170 20 1 15 4 42
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 15 2 10 3 14
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.55 0.41 0.76 13 3469 4 0 4 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.