CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.649 > 0.462
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114 > 0.449 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.530 > 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.798 > 0.531
Total TP 364 > 280
Total TN 110739 > 110668
Total FP 120 < 301
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 21
Total FP INCONS 88 < 226
Total FP COMP 28 < 54
Total FN 323 < 407
P-value 3.27388928538e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 364
Total TN 110739
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 323
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.798
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 280
Total TN 110668
Total FP 301
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 226
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 407
Total Scores
MCC 0.462
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.449 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.531
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3J3F_7 0.73 0.62 0.86 31 7224 6 0 5 1 19
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.21 5 2979 20 1 18 1 18
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.