CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Afold
MCC 0.639 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.186 > 0.469 ± 0.267
Sensitivity 0.521 > 0.412
Positive Predictive Value 0.789 > 0.503
Total TP 101 > 80
Total TN 33745 > 33714
Total FP 37 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 9
Total FP INCONS 26 < 70
Total FP COMP 10 < 24
Total FN 93 < 114
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 33745
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.789
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 33714
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.267
Sensitivity 0.412
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.