Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Mastr(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
Mastr(seed) |
MCC |
0.722 |
>
|
0.034 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.699
±
0.062
|
>
|
0.007
±
0.015
|
Sensitivity |
0.595 |
>
|
0.003 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.879 |
>
|
0.375 |
Total TP |
547 |
>
|
3 |
Total TN |
135398 |
<
|
136012 |
Total FP |
106 |
>
|
5 |
Total FP CONTRA |
8 |
>
|
0 |
Total FP INCONS |
67 |
>
|
5 |
Total FP COMP |
31 |
>
|
0 |
Total FN |
372 |
<
|
916 |
P-value |
5.19332990918e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Mastr(seed)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
547 |
Total TN |
135398 |
Total FP |
106 |
Total FP CONTRA |
8 |
Total FP INCONS |
67 |
Total FP COMP |
31 |
Total FN |
372 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.722 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.699
±
0.062
|
Sensitivity |
0.595 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.879 |
Nr of predictions |
25 |
Performance of Mastr(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)
Total Base Pair Counts |
Total TP |
3 |
Total TN |
136012 |
Total FP |
5 |
Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
Total FP INCONS |
5 |
Total FP COMP |
0 |
Total FN |
916 |
Total Scores |
MCC |
0.034 |
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.007
±
0.015
|
Sensitivity |
0.003 |
Positive Predictive Value |
0.375 |
Nr of predictions |
25 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|