Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Murlet(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
Murlet(20) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.719 |
>
|
0.564 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.696
±
0.078
|
>
|
0.540
±
0.100
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
>
|
0.418 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.870 |
>
|
0.765 |
| Total TP |
410 |
>
|
287 |
| Total TN |
110724 |
<
|
110820 |
| Total FP |
88 |
<
|
109 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
4 |
<
|
5 |
| Total FP INCONS |
57 |
<
|
83 |
| Total FP COMP |
27 |
>
|
21 |
| Total FN |
277 |
<
|
400 |
| P-value |
2.71568867205e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
410 |
| Total TN |
110724 |
| Total FP |
88 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
4 |
| Total FP INCONS |
57 |
| Total FP COMP |
27 |
| Total FN |
277 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.719 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.696
±
0.078
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.870 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Performance of Murlet(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
287 |
| Total TN |
110820 |
| Total FP |
109 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
| Total FP INCONS |
83 |
| Total FP COMP |
21 |
| Total FN |
400 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.564 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.540
±
0.100
|
| Sensitivity |
0.418 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.765 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
