CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PETfold_2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PETfold_2.0(seed)
MCC 0.775 > 0.769
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.778 ± 0.222 > 0.771 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.642 = 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.938 > 0.924
Total TP 61 = 61
Total TN 11142 > 11141
Total FP 6 < 7
Total FP CONTRA 1 = 1
Total FP INCONS 3 < 4
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 34 = 34
P-value 0.0

^top



Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

^top




Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 11142
Total FP 6
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 3
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 34
Total Scores
MCC 0.775
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.778 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.938
Nr of predictions 2

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3W1K_J

tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...

0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12

^top


Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 11141
Total FP 7
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 34
Total Scores
MCC 0.769
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.771 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.924
Nr of predictions 2

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3V_B

5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...

0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3W1K_J

tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...

0.78 0.68 0.90 26 4157 4 1 2 1 12

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Copyright© - Adam Mickiewicz University & IIMCB - All rights reserved