CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(20)
MCC 0.674 > 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.074 > 0.629 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.538 > 0.497
Positive Predictive Value 0.846 > 0.806
Total TP 615 > 568
Total TN 539669 < 539691
Total FP 141 < 166
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 9
Total FP INCONS 102 < 128
Total FP COMP 29 = 29
Total FN 529 < 576
P-value 3.10499527239e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 615
Total TN 539669
Total FP 141
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 102
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 529
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.846
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J2C_N 0.60 0.45 0.80 205 428945 53 6 45 2 252
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 568
Total TN 539691
Total FP 166
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 128
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 576
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.497
Positive Predictive Value 0.806
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_N 0.60 0.45 0.82 204 428952 46 5 40 1 253
3J2L_3 0.78 0.62 0.97 33 7841 3 0 1 2 20
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.32 0.21 0.50 7 7489 11 0 7 4 26
3J3E_7 0.74 0.63 0.87 34 7101 5 1 4 0 20
3J3F_8 0.30 0.25 0.38 9 12222 22 0 15 7 27
3J3F_7 0.78 0.68 0.89 34 7222 5 1 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.65 0.51 0.83 29 6986 6 1 5 0 28
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.71 0.92 35 6983 3 0 3 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.17 0.35 9 14170 18 0 17 1 43
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.19 0.15 0.25 5 11761 25 0 15 10 28
4A1C_3 0.82 0.69 0.97 37 7102 1 0 1 0 17
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.61 0.42 0.89 8 1266 1 0 1 0 11
4ENC_A 0.55 0.42 0.73 8 1315 3 0 3 0 11
4FRG_B 0.75 0.63 0.91 20 3464 2 1 1 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.