CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PknotsRG
MCC 0.722 > 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.062 > 0.569 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.595 > 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.879 > 0.636
Total TP 547 > 450
Total TN 135398 > 135312
Total FP 106 < 311
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 27
Total FP INCONS 67 < 231
Total FP COMP 31 < 53
Total FN 372 < 469
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 547
Total TN 135398
Total FP 106
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 372
Total Scores
MCC 0.722
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.595
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 1 0 0 1 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.77 0.62 0.94 33 7840 4 0 2 2 20
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3J3E_8 0.43 0.30 0.63 10 7487 8 0 6 2 23
3J3E_7 0.78 0.67 0.92 36 7101 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_7 0.85 0.74 0.97 37 7222 2 0 1 1 13
3J3F_8 0.63 0.53 0.76 19 12221 10 0 6 4 17
3J3V_B 0.76 0.61 0.95 35 6984 3 0 2 1 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 2 1 0 1 17
3W1K_J 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 4158 3 1 1 1 12
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.73 0.92 36 6982 3 0 3 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.53 0.37 0.76 19 14171 10 1 5 4 33
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_2 0.57 0.45 0.71 15 11760 12 0 6 6 18
4A1C_3 0.83 0.70 0.97 38 7101 1 0 1 0 16
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 3463 3 1 2 0 12
4FRN_A 0.73 0.61 0.88 22 5126 3 2 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 450
Total TN 135312
Total FP 311
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 231
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 469
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.63 0.55 0.73 11 1525 4 1 3 0 9
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 30 2 19 9 28
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 1 10 0 28
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.31 0.31 0.31 11 12211 37 4 20 13 25
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.58 0.53 0.66 21 4721 12 1 10 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 43 1 27 15 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.77 0.71 0.85 22 2824 4 3 1 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.