CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.710 > 0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.147 > 0.392 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.588 > 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.865 > 0.514
Total TP 134 > 71
Total TN 21510 < 21527
Total FP 26 < 69
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 4
Total FP INCONS 19 < 63
Total FP COMP 5 > 2
Total FN 94 < 157
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 21510
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.710
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.865
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 0 5 0 14
3J16_L 0.82 0.70 0.95 21 2753 1 0 1 0 9
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 2 0 1 1 8
3W3S_B 0.78 0.65 0.93 26 4725 4 0 2 2 14
4AOB_A 0.72 0.57 0.92 24 4345 3 0 2 1 18
4ENB_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1262 5 1 4 0 11
4ENC_A 0.50 0.42 0.62 8 1313 5 1 4 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 71
Total TN 21527
Total FP 69
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 157
Total Scores
MCC 0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.392 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.