CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.609 > 0.233
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.134 > 0.097 ± 0.220
Sensitivity 0.455 > 0.055
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 < 1.000
Total TP 158 > 19
Total TN 50499 < 50673
Total FP 42 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 35 > 0
Total FP COMP 7 > 0
Total FN 189 < 328
P-value 8.61680779366e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 50499
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 189
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.63 0.45 0.90 9 980 1 0 1 0 11
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11
4FRG_B 0.73 0.56 0.95 18 3467 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 19
Total TN 50673
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 328
Total Scores
MCC 0.233
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.097 ± 0.220
Sensitivity 0.055
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.