CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.720 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.701 ± 0.092 > 0.518 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.562 > 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.929 > 0.687
Total TP 131 > 90
Total TN 19801 < 19811
Total FP 12 < 45
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 3
Total FP INCONS 10 < 38
Total FP COMP 2 < 4
Total FN 102 < 143
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 19801
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.720
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.701 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.63 0.45 0.90 9 980 1 0 1 0 11
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 19811
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 143
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.518 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.687
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.