CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.596 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.147 < 0.600 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.444 < 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.805 > 0.708
Total TP 140 < 143
Total TN 47032 > 47004
Total FP 41 < 72
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 8
Total FP INCONS 34 < 51
Total FP COMP 7 < 13
Total FN 175 > 172
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 47032
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.596
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.805
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.63 0.45 0.90 9 980 1 0 1 0 11
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.21 0.52 11 14175 12 0 10 2 41
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 47004
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.